So this is very late.
Sebastian is 9 and a half months already, so I certainly meant for this
to be written months ago. What can I say? Life gets in the way of my
blogging a lot. Which really is a shame, because I could really use the
outlet most of the time...but I digress.
First I would like to add one last method of gender prediction:
The Ultrasound
I
have heard that it is more common or a doctor to be wrong when
predicting a boy since apparently the cord can get in the way and make a
baby girl look like she's got boy parts. These same people have said
that it is almost impossible to be wrong when you predict a girl. Not
that I would know.
Both
of my boys have been predicted boys at their 20 week ultrasounds,
though no one in the family knew this until 20 weeks later when they
finally arrived except for my grandparents, who have known the genders
of both boys before anyone else save the ultrasound techs. I have the
tech seal up the gender in an envelope which I then give to my
grandparents for safe keeping. It's fun, and they get a huge kick out of
being the only ones with the secret. So, for us, the ultrasound was correct for both boys.
The ultrasounds have had 100% accuracy rate for us.
Now,
lets get on with the review of all our other gender prediction methods
we tried out this pregnancy. It should be fun to see which were right
and which were just SO wrong.
As I have said before, I
didn't have any kind of instinct with Parker until I was 25 or 30
weeks. I specifically remember going to my husband in tears and telling
him that I was doomed to be a horrible mother because I had no idea what
I was carrying. Once instinct did kick in however, I was sure
that I was carrying a little man, despite my husband (who had never been
wrong in almost 27 years of gender predicting) insisting we were
expecting a little girl. With Sebastian I was positive from day on. 100%
positive that we would be welcoming a little girl into our family.
Again, hubby disagreed with me and predicted a boy. I guess it was his
turn to be right this time, because Sebastian is most certainly all boy.
Mother's instinct is supposed to be correct something like 70% of the
time, but for me while it was correct with Parker is was very much incorrect with Sebastian.
One day I will have to tell him how sorry I am that the first thing I
bought when I found out I was pregnant was a polka dot dress.
Mother's instinct has had a 50% accuracy rate for us.
Mayan Gender Test
The ancient Mayans developed a gender test which takes into account the
year of conception and your age at the time you conceived. If both
numbers are even/odd you will be having a little girl. For example, if a
mother conceived in 2010 at the age of 24 she will be expecting a
daughter. You would also be expecting a girl if you were 25 when you
conceived in 2011. If one number is even and the other is odd you will
be expecting a little boy. For instance, if you were 25 when you got
pregnant in 2010 a little bundle of blue is on the way.
This method of gender prediction was incorrect with Parker, who I conceived in 2008 at the age of 24. It was also incorrect with Sebastian, who I conceived in 2010 at the age of 26. (Though I mistakenly put down that I was 25 when I conceived in the original post. Maybe it was wishful thinking since I was about to turn 27. lol.)
This method of gender prediction was incorrect with Parker, who I conceived in 2008 at the age of 24. It was also incorrect with Sebastian, who I conceived in 2010 at the age of 26. (Though I mistakenly put down that I was 25 when I conceived in the original post. Maybe it was wishful thinking since I was about to turn 27. lol.)
The
Mayans are apparently really bad at this prediction thing. Gives me
hopes that the world is going to be a-OK this December. :0)
The Mayan gender test has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
Heart Rate Gender Predictor
The heart rate prediction is really very simple. If the baby's heart
rate beats 140bpm or faster, you are carrying a little girl. If it is
slower than 140bmp, you are carrying a little boy. As far as I can
gather from other mothers I have spoken to, this is another that is
wrong more often than it is right. It was incorrect with Parker, who never had a heart rate below 140 until the day I went into labor with him. It was also incorrect with Sebastian,
whose heart rate ranged from the 120s up into the 190s. (It was only in
the 120s once. It averaged in the 150s the entire pregnancy.)
The heart rate predictor has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
In this
test you take your wedding ring and hang it from a chain/string/hair (I
have seen all three posted in different "versions" of this old wive's
tale) above your stomach. If it swings from side to side start painting
the nursery blue! If it swings in a circular motion go stock up on some
pink at Sherwin Williams! I used a chain, though I have no idea if that
has any baring on the "test".
I can't remember the results when I did this with Parker, though I remember doing it. However, I did this test three different times when pregnant with Sebastian, stopping the ring completely before I let it go again, and every single time it started moving it was in a side to side motion. So, it was correct for Sebastian. Since that is the only test I can remember, I guess I have to go with it being pretty darn accurate. :0)
The ring test has had a 100% accuracy rate for us. (As far as I can remember.)
This
prediction method only works if you already have a child, so I
apologize to all the first time mommies out there. The theory goes that
if your previous child's first word was "Mama" you have a little lady in
your future. If your child's first word was "Dada" then get ready for a
little man. I wouldn't put a whole lot of faith in this one. Daddy or
"Dada" is statistically the more common first of the two to be said, but
somehow women still manage to outnumber men these days. :0) Still, I'm
including this for the sake of science!
Obviously, I don't have a result for Parker, since he was our first. His first word was indeed "Dada" though, right after he turned 6 months old. (He didn't bother with "Mama" until he was 8 months...and Sebastian still hasn't bothered with "Mama", though "Dada" and "Baba" (brother) are regulars in his vocabulary.) So, this prediction method was correct with Sebastian.
Obviously, I don't have a result for Parker, since he was our first. His first word was indeed "Dada" though, right after he turned 6 months old. (He didn't bother with "Mama" until he was 8 months...and Sebastian still hasn't bothered with "Mama", though "Dada" and "Baba" (brother) are regulars in his vocabulary.) So, this prediction method was correct with Sebastian.
The first word test has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
The way this old wive's tale goes if
a pregnant woman’s left breast is larger than the right breast, she’s
having a sweet little girl. If the right breast is larger, it’s a
bouncing baby boy. I wonder if that means twins if they are the same
size? Either way, I asked my husband's opinion on this one. I wanted him
to feel involved after all. ;0) According to him my right breast was "much larger", but he went on to say "But it always is!". Perhaps I am destined to have all sons? Either way, this test was correct with Parker and correct with Sebastian, so it's got a lot going for it right now.
The breast test has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
Possibly
the most random I have read about, the bread test determines
your baby's gender based on what part of the bread you prefer to eat. If
you are one of those people who loves the heel of the bread, congrats!
It's a boy! Prefer your bread from the middle of the loaf? It's a girl! I
haven't ever been a huge fan of the ends of a loaf, but this isn't a
preference that has changed at any part of my life, including both
pregnancies when I was eating a lot of bread. (For both of them there
were many times that toast was all I could keep down.) So this test was incorrect with Parker and incorrect with Sebastian.
The bread test has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
Apparently
you can figure out the sex of your children based on what your mother
had and in what order. If you are the first born, the story goes, you
will have what your mother had but starting with her second child. If
you are the middle child, you will have what she said, but starting
with the third child and if you are the last child, you will have what
your mother had in the exact order. For example, in my case I am the
oldest of my mother's 3 live births and after me she had a son and then
another daughter. According to this I would have a son first, then 2
daughters...if I chose to have exactly 3 children. I have no idea how
this works with a person with more than 3 children or if your mother had
multiple miscarriages as mine did, but if you take this at surface
value, it was correct with my Parker. However, it was incorrect with Sebastian, at least if you are only counting live births. Like I said, I have no idea how this would factor in losses. I am
pretty sure we can put this in the bin with the least likely of our old
wive's tales. After all, it is generally accepted that the gender of
your baby comes from the father's genes, making what your mother
had and in what order a completely non-valid point in gender
determination. Still, it is fun to add to the list, and also to torture
my younger brother with the thought of two daughters before he has any
chance at a boy. :0)
Family history has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
Apparently,
if you hold a necklace over your hand it will tell you not only what
the gender of the child you are carrying is, but the gender of all your
children in the exact order you will have them. As with The Ring Test
if the necklace swings back and forth you're predicted a boy and if it
moves in a circle it’s a girl. The necklace doesn't have to be stopped
between "predictions". It will simply do one thing for a period of time,
stop its self, and then start up again. You can do it as long as you
would like in order to see what the order of your own little litter will be no
matter if you choose to have 2 or 20! I have heard people swear up and
down that this test is 100% right for everyone they have ever done it
for. Of course, at 100% accuracy, I had to try, right?
This was correct with Parker
as it started swinging back and forth almost right away. It then seemed
to stop before it started moving in a gentle circular motion, which predicted a girl next and made it incorrect for Sebastian. I suppose that this makes its further predictions of yet two more boys before our fifth arrives as a girl null and void.
The necklace over your palm has had a 50% accuracy rate for us.
Morning Sickness
This one is very easy. If you have little or no morning sickness you are blessed. ;0) You are also predicted a son. If the toilet has suddenly become your new place of residence, you can expect a daughter. Were this true, I would spend my nights praying for all boys, and I don't think I'd be alone in that prayer. As it is, this was very incorrect with Parker, who had me making frequent trips to the nearest bathroom up until I was about 20 weeks along, and very very incorrect with Sebastian, who had me throwing up to and during labor.
The morning sickness prediction has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
Cold Feet
If you're already pregnant it might seem a little late in the game to have cold feet, but if you are hoping for a specific gender a little extra chill in your toes might be a good thing! According to the old wives, if you're feeling the need for extra socks this pregnancy you can expect a son soon. If you don't notice any temperature difference in your little piggies, use the extra money you're saving on socks to go out and buy some girl clothes!
There was no noticeable chill in my feet during my first pregnancy, making this incorrect with Parker. I am generally a very warm blooded person though, so I didn't find it odd. (I am that girl wearing flip flops in December as long as there isn't snow on the ground!) When I was pregnant with Sebastian however, my toes became little ice cubes. I seriously looked down at times to see my toes and feet changing to a chilly looking purpilish blue color instead of their usual healthy pink, making it correct with Sebastian.
The cold feet prediction method has had a 50%accuracy rate for us.
Rapunzel! Rapunzel!
You
guessed it! This old wive's tale has to do with your hair. As the story
goes, girls strip away all the good vitamins and minerals that your
hair needs to become lush and full (Presumably so that their own locks
will be gorgeous, of course. You know how vindictive those babies can be
in the womb!), leaving you with dry limp locks void of all color and
volume. Boys, apparently not worried about the state of their own hair,
leave your hair alone and in fact cause it to become fuller and shinier!
Every son is a Mommy's Boy at heart it seems, helping us to become more
beautiful even before taking their first breaths!
Unfortunately, my own son
appears to be rather vain, for he turned my hair into an absolute wreck!
Granted, it was growing faster than weeds in the sunshine, but it also
had the look and consistency of last falls old straw! I ended up cutting
off about 12 inches after he was born to try to start over and salvage
what I could, so this was oh so incorrect with Parker! As scared
as I was of it happening the second time around, my hair was just fine, and actually
looked better than it usually did, though it didn't grow quite as fast
as it did when I was pregnant with Bubba. I suppose that made it correct with Sebastian, though I think it is all the luck of the draw anyways.
This prediction method has had a 50% accuracy rate for us.
Oval or Heart?
Apparently it is our baby's
gender, not the unexplainable way that every woman stores water and fat
differently, that determines the shape of our face during pregnancy. Who
knew? The saying goes that you are having a girl if you get more round
and rosy during pregnancy. Is your face longer and more oval? Must be
because you are having a little boy and not because you are one
of the lucky ones that doesn't gain in your face during these long 9
months! (And here you were thinking it was all about your good genes!)
Believe it or not, this was correct with Parker.
Of course, it could also be the fact that I gained absolutely zero
weight while pregnant (which of course meant that I was losing as he was
gaining), but don't tell the hard core believers that. Let's just stick
with it being because my little man was blessing my facial features. It was correct with Sebastian too, but it could have also been the 40lbs I lost during his pregnancy.
This prediction method has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
To Key or Not To Key?
Sometimes I am sure it must be a
man making these up instead of the poor old wife scapegoats. After all,
what woman would assume that the manner in which you pick up a key
has anything to do with the gender of your unborn baby? Still, that is
exactly what this particular tale claims. Legend has it, if you pick up a
single key by the fatter end or the top of the key you are having a
little boy. If you pick it up by the narrow end or bottom of the key
you'd better be ready for a girl in your future. To make it even more
confusing, if you happen to pick up your key in the center you are
expecting twins...or a very gender confused baby.
Here's another crazy tale that was, believe it or not, correct with Parker.
I always pick up a key by the fat part. Anything else feels weird to
me. I still don't see in any way shape or form what that has to do with
the gender of my children, but it was obviously correct with Sebastian too. I wonder what it means if you don't touch your keys at all, but pick them up using the key chain.
This prediction method has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
Sweet or Sour?
Ah, cravings! Something every
pregnant woman can appreciate! Some say that they are in our heads. Some
say that they are our body's way of getting something essential that we
are lacking in our pregnancy. Some, mostly husbands sent out to find an
impossible snack at 2am, say they are a pain in the rear! This old
wive's tale says they are a way of predicting the gender of your baby.
If all you want are sweets then apparently a sweet and sugar little girl
is headed your way! Craving lemons and other things that pucker your
lips? Sounds like you're having a boy. I think I rather resent this
manner of prediction, as it almost sounds as if it is being suggested
that little girls are melt in your mouth sweethearts while boys are sour
little things! Some old wife must have had a lot of daughters! (Or some
horrible little boys!)
During my first pregnancy I
craved fruits as though my life depended on them. Being that I was
pregnant in the dead of winter in the middle of nowhere Idaho, these
cravings were particularly inconvenient for both me and my husband. Have
you ever tried to find ripe strawberries in December? It's not
possible! Of course, this constant cravings for the sweetest of fruits
means that this particular tale was incorrect with Parker, who is
certainly all boy, though a very sweet one if I do say so myself! With
Sebastian I also started off craving fruits very, very early in
pregnancy...but with an added taste for the uber sour too! I will freely
admit that I ate through an entire bag of Sour Patch Kids one night and
then pitifully begged my husband to go out for more. In fact, there for
several weeks I made sure to always have some kind of sour candy in the
diaper bag, as it also seemed to help with some of my morning sickness.
(And if it didn't help, it at least didn't taste horrible coming back
up!) In the end, my fruit and sweet craving overcame my sour ones
though, making this prediction incorrect with Sebastian too.
This prediction method has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
The Chinese Gender Calender
Ah,
the Chinese Gender Chart. Some
swear by it, some scoff, some don't even know what it is. I, personally,
find all of these gender prediction methods fascinating (or at least
amusing), so I had to add it into The Gender Prediction Project! The
things is, there are so many versions of this chart running around on
the internet that I can't use just one and say that I've done my job for
this highly scientific project of mine. :0) So I ended up doing all of
them that popped up on the first page of my Google search. It took
awhile, but it was all in the name of research.
For anyone who doesn't know, the
Chinese Gender Calender is said to be over 700 years old and over 90%
accurate "when used correctly". Using it correctly means calculation
your lunar age for many of the charts, though not all of
them seem to make this distinction via the interwebs. It was "recently"
discovered in an ancient royal tomb in China and has been correctly
predicting births around the globe ever sense...or so "they" say.
One of the simplest to use that
can be imagined, the calender at the popular parenting website doesn't
ask you anything about lunar ages or charting. You don't even have to look
at the calender at all. You answer two simple questions about your age
and the month you conceived and it pops an answer back at you in the
form of "Congratulations! It's a girl! or It's a boy!" and then advises
you to brush up on your baby names.
While this chart was accurate for Parker, it ended up being completely incorrect for Sebastian, which makes how annoying it is
to have to enter your e-mail address into the Parents website every time
you want to use this chart even worse.
Parents.com was only 50% accurate for us.
At first glance, this site is
actually pretty intimidating and something I would have passed over were
it not in the name of research. It gives you an official looking
history and background of the chart along with samples of other charts
and a set of rules to follow when using the chart. Not exactly my idea of fun, but some people take this kind of thing very seriously apparently. Like I said though, for the sake of science...
The first "step" of using this chart is to figure out when your birth day falls by converting our Gregorian
(Western)
Calendar to a Chinese Lunar Calendar. Luckily they have a chart that
makes this process "easy". The following step involves finding out not
only your lunar age, but the age of your child as well.
This step is more complicated, and a little silly if you ask me. The
idea that your baby is born as a one year old and if the lunar new year
is the next day would be considered two just doesn't click in my
head...but I am obviously not enlightened. Regardless, big old pain in
the rear, and we're only on the second step. There is also math
involved, which usually turns me off of most things.
What
it all comes down to, if you are even still with me at this point, is
that I was 26 in the 6th lunar month (July) of the year I was actually 24...which makes this charts prediction accurate with Parker.
I was also apparently 28 in the 10th lunar month (November) this past
time (I was in fact only 26...why you would use a calendar that makes
you older is beyond me!) which means it was accurate with Sebastian too. Even though it was right, I think this was a lot
of work in order to come up with a gender prediction. Some people are really into this kind of thing...
ChineseGenderChart.info was 100% accurate for us.
With
a name like babygenderprediction.com, you have to have high hopes
right? This chart also requires your lunar age and lunar month of
conception, but there are two very easy links right there on the main
page to help you find both...or you'd think. Repeatedly clicking on both
links produced absolutely nothing for me, so I used the lunar
ages and months that I had taken such time to figure out at out last
website. I suppose that this could effect the results.
According to this chart, both my hes should have been shes. It was inaccurate with Parker and inaccurate with Sebastian.
Babygenderprediction.com was 0% accurate for both of the boys.
Ah! Thank goodness! Another
chart where all I have to do is type in my age and the month I
conceived! Oh why can't they all be like this? The chart at The Bump
asks simply for your age and the month you got pregnant and then the
chart below highlights a happy looking pink or blue swaddled baby
complete with a cheery voice bubble saying "hi, mom!" Simple and fast,
no math required!
The chart was also accurate with Parker
when using my actual age at conception. For fun, and so no one could
come back and claim I didn't do it "correctly", I also typed in my lunar
age and got the same happy boy result for my little man. (The chart did
not ask for a lunar age, but I felt it was important to be thorough.)
Using my actual age I was predicted a girl, but when I typed in my lunar age I was predicted a boy with Sebastian, which I guess makes this chart accurate if your lunar age is used...which they don't ask for at all.
The Bump was between 50-100% accurate depending on if I used my lunar age or not.
Another simple chart to use, the
chart at iVillage doesn't ask for you to figure out your lunar age
either. (Don't worry, I did it both ways.) I love simple things in life!
Without all the complications of my lunar age, this chart was accurate with Parker but was wrong with Sebastian.
Of course, if I use my lunar age, which is how the chart is supposed to be "accurate", it was accurate with Parker and accurate with Sebastian. It's starting to look like this lunar age thing might be going somewhere.
iVilliage was between 50-100% accurate depending on if I used my lunar age or not.
Another chart that doesn't
require any calculations or math, but I'm taking no chances at this
point. Besides, I'm in it with both feet now. Again, when using my
actual ages this chart was accurate with Parker but wrong with Sebastian.
Unfortunately, when using my lunar age on this chart, I was again told that Parker should have been a daughter and that Sebastian should be a girl too. Not so good, About.com.
About.com was only 0-50% accurate depending on if I used my lunar age or not.
This site has two different methods of determining your baby's gender, one being called the "Ancient Chinese Gender Chart" and the other being called the "Chinese Lunar Calendar". I did both. Why not. It's just two different versions of the same thing, and both were easy to do.
The Chinese Gender Chart asks your month, date, and year of birth in addition to your month, date, and year of conception. I admit, I guessed a little on the exact date of conception. I am fairly sure within a day or two for both of my children, but there is still a window for mistake in there. If that somehow messes with my results, I do hope I can be forgiven. It was accurate with Parker though, and predicted a boy for Sebastian as well.
The Chinese Lunar Calendar was accurate with Parker as well but predicted a girl for us when using my actual ages, but was inaccurate with Parker and predicted a girl if you used my lunar ages.
Thelaboroflove.com's Chinese Gender Chart has had 100% accuracy for us but The Chinese Lunar Calendar was only 0-50% accurate depending on if I used my lunar age or not.
This one is a little different in that it asks you the mother's age at the time of birth
instead of at conception. Again, this says nothing about a lunar age,
and I'm not going to try to figure out my lunar age at the time of my
children's births...sorry.
Either way, it was inaccurate with Parker but accurate with Sebastian. I am pretty sure that, though this chart actually claims a 99% accuracy rate, it can be debunked. It doesn't look very official or well researched, and it is the only chart I've seen that wants the mother's age, lunar or otherwise, at birth instead of conception.
Webwomb.com was only 50% accurate with us.
This is an easy one to do
provided you already know your lunar age. (If not, there are several
sites above that will help you with that if you are patient.) All you
have to do is type in your lunar age and the month you conceived and
they will pop back at you with a baby gender. Using what I now know
about my lunar age I did it twice and wasn't shocked to find that it was
inaccurate with Parker and inaccurate with Sebastian too.
Fortunebaby.com was 0% accurate for us.
Another prediction method that is a
little different. This one asks not only for the mother's birth month
and year plus the conception month and year, but the father's
birth month and year as well. It is the first chart that I've seen that
takes the father into account...something you would think you would see
more often since it is generally accepted that it is the father's sperm which determine a baby's gender anyways.
Using this one I found it to be incorrect with Parker but correct with Sebastian.
Babygendertool.com was only 50% accurate for us.
In summery, out of all of the Chinese Gender Calendars I did, there was only one that was 100% accurate. On average, they are right about 50% of the time. So is a coin flip.
Daddy's Weight
This old wive's tale involved
Daddy getting on the scale instead of you, which I personally think is a
nice change of pace for a pregnant Mommy. The "rule" is that if Daddy
gains weight during your pregnancy you can expect a little boy, but if
he maintains his pre-pregnancy weight you can expect a little girl.
This tale was correct with Parker,
as Daddy was the only one who actually gained weight while I was
pregnant. (For some reason, I lose during my pregnancies.) Michael was
not happy to be the only one gaining during my pregnancy. I will admit,
it tickled me a bit. :0) With Sebastian, Daddy reported that he hadn't
gained anything (Though he was deployed, so I couldn't check on him
behind his back. Pure honor system.) which means we should have had a girl. So, it was incorrect with Sebastian.
I'm pretty sure Michael didn't lie about weight gain either, since they
always come home for deployments all in shape and thinner than they
left.
This prediction method has had a 50% accuracy rate for us.
Nipple Color
Apparently, the color of your areolae has darkened considerably it can tell you what you are having. If you are like me and have next to no color anywhere
on your body, this would probably be really easy no notice. If you
already have pretty dark nipples, I am not sure how hard it would be to
tell. According to the tale, if you are getting darker under your bra,
you can expect a little boy in your future. No change? A little girl is
on the way.
Honestly, I couldn't remember with Parker if my nipples darkened, so I asked someone who I knew would
remember...my husband. I consider him the leading expert on all things
involving my breasts. He certainly pays more attention to them than I
do. He said they did darken slightly, though it certainly didn't last,
which makes this another tale that was correct with Parker. With Sebastian there was no doubt. Even someone as completely oblivious to their
body as myself can't deny that I got dark. It seemed to happen over night. One day I was in the shower, looked down and thought 'Wow, look at that...I wonder if there is an old wive's tale about that!' Sure enough, there was, and it was correct with Sebastian too.
Nipple color has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
Front Or Back?
This
tale is all about how you are carrying the extra weight. Apparently if
it's all out front and people behind you wouldn't be able to tell you
are pregnant until you turned around, you are expecting a boy. If you
are getting wider not only in your stomach, but in your hips, rear, and
thighs, a little girl is on the way. Darn girls! I don't think anyone
should ever tell a pregnant Mommy that her rear is getting wider, even
if it is true, but apparently some people are just that stupid brave.
With my son he was way
out there in the front. I looked like I was a walking distortion mirror
there at the end. I suppose that makes this another tale that was correct with Parker. I ended up way out there the second time around too, making it correct with Sebastian as well.
This method of prediction has had a 100% accuracy rate for us.
Show Me Your Hands!
Nope,
this has nothing to do about getting arrested. It's all about if you
would put your hands palms up or palms down if someone were to ask you
to show them your hands. Apparently if you would present your hands to a
person palms up you are expecting a little girl, while palms down would
mean a boy.
It's
an off day when I don't have multiple people asking me to show them my
hands. ;0) For the sake of science of course, I had to figure this one
out. Turns out my inclination was to offer my hands palms up when asked,
meaning that this was incorrect with Sebastian. I certainly
don't remember anyone asking me to show them my hands when I was
pregnant with Parker, but I can only assume that my instincts would have
been the same then, making this incorrect with Parker too.
This method of prediction has had a 0% accuracy rate for us.
And
that was it. Those are all the predictions I managed to do during my
pregnancy with Sebastian. There are several I wanted to do and didn't
manage to get to before his arrival, but I am looking forward to doing
this little project again the next time we are blessed with a pregnancy.
It really was fun. I enjoyed every minute. I hope you did too. If you
would like, please feel free to go back and read my original posts.
Until
next time, have fun predicting. :0) Feel free to add your own gender
prediction methods in the comments! I'll be sure to try them next time
around.
1 comment:
that is a wonderful list. much noted thanks.
planning for conception is involved and a life time decision. when planning for a child couples may also want to consider natural systems that may help in selecting a baby of their choice.
a reputable system was developed by Dr. Patrick Shoun and is explained at babymethod.com
hope it helps
all the best to future parents!
Post a Comment